The Case Of Speluncean Explorers Essay Example for Free

The Case Of Speluncean Explorers Essay FACTS A group of 5 including the 4 defendants and Roger Whetmore had entered into a limestone cavern. A landslide occurred and the boulders blocked the only entrance of the cave. When they discovered the problem, the 5 settled themselves on the obstructed entry until a rescue part could rescue them. Employers had left indicators at the headquarters of the society about where the cavern was. On the failure of their return, a rescue party was dispatched. The rescue task was really difficult. More men and machinery had to be conveyed to the remote area. A group of engineers, workmen, geologists and other experts were appointed. The work of removing the obstructions was frustrated by fresh landslides. Ten workmen were killed while clearing the entrance. All the treasury of the Speculean community was exhausted. Eight hundred thousand frevlars raised by legislative grants were all exhausted before the men were rescued. Success was finally achieved on the 32nd day of the rescue mission. It was known that the workers had carried very little provisions with them and that there were no animal or food matter in the cavern. On the 20th day of the rescue, it was discovered that the workers had carried with them a radio transmitter through which communication could be established. The workers asked the physicians and the experts how long it would take for them to be rescued, the physicians told them that it would take atleast 10 days and there was a little possibility for them to survive. Then they asked the physicians whether they could survive if they consumed one their coworkers. The physicians chairman replied reluctantly in affirmative. Roger Whetmore asked the physicians if they could do that by casting lots. There was no answer from their side. Then he asked if any party or a judge was willing to answer this question, there was no answer. He then asked if a priest could answer the question, unfortunately, even they could not. Thereafter, no more messages were received as the battery of the radio receiver had been exhausted. On the 23rd day of the rescue, Whetmore was killed and was eaten by his companions. Then it was known from the defendants that Whetmore had proposed this idea about whod be eaten by the throw of a dice. When it was Whetmores turn, the dice was thrown by a defendant and it turned out to be against Whetmore. He then was killed and eaten by his companions. VERDICT OF THE JUDGES CHIEF JUSTICE TRUEPENNY: He believed that the four defendants should be sentenced to death as he stated Whoever shall wilfully take the life of another shall be punished by death. He mentions that the above statute is not open to more than one interpretation ie it is unambiguous. He also suggested the idea of executive clemency adding that granting mercy would be in the hands of the executive. JUSTICE FOSTER He disagreed with the verdict of the Chief Justice. He thought that the defendants were innocent. He believed that the statute put forward by CJ Truepenny was not applicable  in this case as the law of nature was applied (defendants were in a state of nature at the time of the killing). He also said that if 10 workmens lives were sacrificed to save 5, why not kill 1 to save 4 lives. JUSTICE TATTING He felt sorry for the defendants but at the same time, also had a feeling of disgust at the act they committed. He strongly disagreed with Justice Fosters state of nature. He also thinks that self defence cant be applied to the case as it would raise difficulties. Ultimately, he is not able to decide the case. JUSTICE KEEN He took on the case from a morality point of view. He was in favour of the defendants not being given a death sentence. He criticized the other judges for failing to differentiate between the moral and legal aspects of the case. He also criticizes the courts self defence excuse. JUSTICE HANDY He uses a common-sense approach instead of using legal principles to solve the case. He had a philosophical point of view and was in favour of publics opinion on the case. MY VERDICT ON THE CASE This case has two sides ie the legal side and the moral side. If this case is seen from the legal side, then a death sentence is justified for the four defendants as the statute itself states that whoever shall wilfully take the life of another shall be punished by death. But I personally think that this case is special and it should be seen from the moral point of view. I dont believe that the defendants should be given a death sentence. I strongly disagree with CJ Truepennys verdict, with all due respect. The four defendants were in extremely unfavourable conditions and they had no choice but to kill one the companions and consume them, so that they could survive. The facts suggest that when Roger Whetmore asked the chairman of the physicians if they consume any one of the four companions, they would survive or not, the chairman also replied in affirmative even though he was reluctant. And the decision to kill Roger Whetmore was also justified as per the throw of dice. I agree with Justice Fosters views as well. First of all, the law of nature should be applied to this case as the defendants were in a state of nature at the time of killing. And as per the facts suggest, 10 workmen were killed to save the life of 5 people, then why not kill 1 person and save the life of 4 others? As far as granting executive clemency is concerned, I think that it should completely be in the hands of the executive, but I would be in favour of granting them with it.

Essay --

Kashayla Snipes Dr. Nancy Blair English Composition 1102 February 25, 2014 Othello: A Tragedy of Jealosuy â€Å"Jealousy is troublesome to others, but a torment to themselves.† Those are words from a famous entrepreneur and philosopher, William Penn. In William Shakespeare’s Othello, the act of jealousy is a powerful sensation seen almost in every aspect and relationship throughout the tragedy. Furthermore, it is one of the most important topics in the play. Based on the conflicts within Othello, jealousy can be defined as troubles or misfortune caused by hallucinations. At the same time, Millicent Bell states in his essay, â€Å"Othello’s Jealousy† that the characters are driven to madness by being allowed to see what really is not so or simply using imagination. Bell also goes on to say the jealousy traits are shown only in a sexual manner. That statement can be argued against. True enough, sexual jealousy is shown in Othello, but it is not the only form of jealousy exposed. According to Medical Dictionary, sexual jealousy is a condition characterized by suspicion of a spouse's infideli...

Learning Styles, Motivation and on the Job Training

The first learning style is sensing vs. intuitive learning style. Sensing learners like learning facts and solving problems by well established methods. Unlike intuitive learners, sensor learners resent testing on material that has not been explicitly covered in training. (p 169) Intuitive learners often prefer discovering new relationships and can be innovative in their approach to problem solving. They dislike repetition and are better at grasping concepts than sensor learners. Unlike sensors, intuitive learners don’t like courses that involve a lot of memorization and routine calculations. In order to get the most out of training, sensor learners need to be intuitive learners at times and at times intuitive learners need to be sensor learners. The trainer can help the sensor learner by organizing the training by using a problem first method. Intuitors can be more difficult to train especially if the training involves a lot of memorization. The trainer can help these people by creating incentives such as a game with a reward for memorizing certain key points of the training. Next there is the visual vs. erbal learner. Visual learners remember best what they see, pictures, diagrams, flowcharts and demonstrations. 169 Verbal learners get more out of words; both written and spoken. Visual learners are among the easiest to train. There are a wide variety of materials available to supplement lectures for the trainer to use to engage the visual learner. The trainer can help the verbal learner by having handouts of the presentation available or providing paper in which the trainee can summarize the presentation in his/her own words. Sequential learners vs. global learners. Sequential learners gain understanding when things are presented step by step. The global learner is one who needs to see the whole picture before being able to absorb the details. The sequential learner can be helped by providing a copy of the lecture material with blank spaces for the sequential learner to fill in key terms and definitions. The global learner can be helped by explaining how each new module fits in with the overall purpose of the training. Active learners vs reflective learners. Active learners need to do something. They can be helped by applying the information, discussing it, or explaining it to others. Reflective learners prefer to think about the new information before applying it. â€Å" Let’s try it out and see how it works† is how the active learner might respond. The reflective learner on the other hand might say, â€Å" Let’s think it through first†. The active learner can be helped by the trainer by being placed in group settings. They have a particularly hard time sitting in a lecture and taking notes. The reflective learner, however, prefers working alone so it might be beneficial to give this type of learner questions to answer at the end of each training module. One of the most frequently used training methods is on the job training (OJT). Compare and contrast the characteristics of an informal OJT program with that of a formal one. Before the advent of training classrooms, on the job training was the most predominant form of training.. This was commonly referred to as apprenticeship. Master craftsmen passed on their skills to novices who worked alongside of them Today, on the job training is used primarily for teaching new technology or increasing skills in the use of current technology. Informal OJT consists of using more skilled co-workers or supervisors to train the less skilled or less experienced employee. The informal OJT has not been thought out or prepared (p 236). The workers generally learn on a trial and error basis with some feedback from supervisors or coworkers. It is also done on an ad hoc basis with no predetermined content or process. With informal OJT there aren’t any objectives or goals and trainers are often chosen on the basis of their technical expertise not their training ability because they haven’t had any formal training on how to train. This creates more room for error because the trainers are often inconsistent and may even be introducing methods that are not approved by the organization. Formal OJT programs are just the opposite. They have a carefully thought out sequence of events. Like informal OJT the trainee gets to observe the trainer performing the job related tasks. Unlike informal OJT, the procedures involved in the tasks are discussed, before, during and after the training. In formal OJT, the trainee does not begin performing the tasks until the trainer feels that they are ready to do so. The trainee is given more and more of the job to perform as he/she masters the each skill necessary to perform the task. Because a trainer is used who is not only experienced with the task but trained as a trainer, the company can be assured that the new employees are learning the tasks more quickly and systematically than in an informal training. Another advantage is consistency of training. The company can be sure that all of the workers performing the same tasks in any of the company departments or locations will be performing in the same manner. With formal OJT, inputs and outputs can be assessed to determine if any modifications need to be made to the training. Describe four factors that should be considered when developing an effective computer based training (CBT) program. One of the biggest factors to consider is the cost of the program. Developing a CBT can be a costly endeavor. Costs of the program include the wages of the course developer as well as the wages of the trainees while they are taking the program (p 276). Then the organization must also consider the costs of the hardware and software needed to conduct the training. The company must then weigh these costs against the number of trainees that will be using the program and how often the program will be needed as well as the frequency of updating the material. The second factor to consider is the control of material and the training process. Because the content is built directly into the program, the company has complete control over the content of the learning material that all trainees are getting. This is advantageous for companies with multiple locations because it allows for consistency in the training. Also, the trainees are moved through the training process based on their understanding of each training module. The trainees can also start and stop the training rocess which allows for minimal disruption in production. CBTs can help employees enhance their knowledge. The CBT can present the facts in several different formats and presentation styles. It also can provide a variety of modules to show the employees how to apply the knowledge to their actual job. Analyze the three things an organization should do to motivate a trainee before the trainee attends training. An organization can have one of the best training programs available, but if the trainees are not motivated they will not learn. When conducting a training program, it is important to remember that the trainees all have different learning styles. Each of the trainees will have a different learning style than the others. Most likely they will have a combination of the sensing/intuitive, active/reflective, visual/verbal and sequential/global learning styles. Because of this it is important to remember that a variety of training methods be incorporated into the training and it is also important to remember that there will be modules of the training that will be more effective for some trainees than others.

A Lie Is Not Moral Or Ethical Value - 1004 Words

It is never okay to lie to someone. Lying is disrespectful. I believe, the purpose to a lie is achieving a goal at the expense of another. It holds no moral or ethical value. Human beings are entitled to be respect by others. A philosopher known as Immanuel Kant who established two rules called as categorical imperative under the deontology theory (Kant, 2008). Deontology is the obligation or duty to act (Mosser, 2013). The rules in categorical imperative are one should act in a way that maxims resulting in action being a universal law and act with respect (an action of humanity resulting as people being equals in an end not as means to an end). Therefore, lying is wrong. It is misleading to people with false information†¦show more content†¦People do not develop good ethics or morality based on the foundation to lies. The act of goodwill is good in itself (Kant, 2008). Again, a lie holds no moral or ethical value. Morality is identifying good or bad and right o r wrong (Mosser, 2013). Therefore, the false information from a lie misleads and misguides moral reasons and logic in human behavior (Kant, 2008). I feel that Immanuel Kant would say that lying is considered moral incorrect because the act would not be accepted as a universal rule and the treatment to the act places others a means to an ends based on the duty or obligation of people with regard to the term goodwill. Immanuel Kant would argue that the purposes of acts are unconditional purpose of producing goodwill and the conditional purpose of being happy (Kant, 2008). Immanuel Kant would see that telling the truth is cultivating reasons that brings happiness from practical good will (Kant, 2008). However, a question rises to the thoughts of the â€Å"duty to make false promises.† My perspective in a false promises is poor morality and ethical values. A false promise is a lie. It falls out of the scope to Immanuel Kant rules and other ethical theories. Lies are a creator of instability and uncertainty in reason (Kant, 2008) . It should be rejected because it is harmful to other’s goodwill and the nature of own good will (Kant, 2008). However, there is no universal standard that requires the